Do you have a calendar item, brief or newstip?
Please contact us.
Derail bid to fund BART at local project's expense
Regional transportation agency staff should rethink a recommendation to divert $91 million from a Dumbarton rail corridor project into the costly, questionable scheme to extend BART into the South Bay.The latest price tag for connecting BART through San Jose and into Santa Clara is $6 billion, an expense that the region cannot seem to cover. The project has languished for years while South Bay leaders searched for ways to save it.
The latest idea is to complete the 16-mile project in stages, presumably until the effort founders.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission staff suggests that $91 million budgeted for Dumbarton could be used to extend BART's terminus in Fremont another five miles into the city's Warm Springs district. This money would be repaid at some future date - we hope.
Palo Alto City Council Member Yoriko Kishimoto rightly said that the Warm Springs plan is, by itself, a "bridge to nowhere." The project still falls well short of the link to downtown San Jose that presumably makes it feasible.
That missing piece includes no less than 4.5 miles of subway construction under San Jose. Don't expect that anytime soon.
Admittedly, the Dumbarton rail corridor project faces its own challenges.
The proposal to run trains over the Bay between the Peninsula and the East Bay has doubled in cost to $600 million. Meanwhile, residents in Menlo Park are raising concerns about possible train noise, and the Santa Clara County civil grand jury has raised valid questions about the Dumbarton project.
However, a previous grand jury has already blasted the BART project, as well. What will the region gain by shifting money from a project short of funding to another that may be completely unworkable?
Regional transportation officials should not be siphoning away money from the Dumbarton project or any others to BART until they can devise a viable plan for a South Bay BART presence.
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
43 comments in
Judge upholds key evidence in Ayres trial
“Thanks, Jane, as always ! Have you ever heard of Roger Levin, the doctor Mark from ...” — Alison
2 comments in
Major-league dreams alive for Borchard
“(uh), thanks for pointing that out. It's fixed.” — Web correcterer
1 comment in
Out of the Shadows: Debate rages over whether ...
“la la land rules i think so” — lal poo


Comment on this story